Originally Posted by
MagnumMan308
Again, you resort to taking my statements out of context and instead imply that I am arguing 100% absolutes.
you clearly said "they dont live to get that big" and you could hunt for 365days and have no chance at killing a 140" buck, sounds pretty absolute to me. how did I take you out of context?
Fact is deer numbers here are low, hunting pressure is high, and genetics are mediocre at best using deer killed by me and many others that I've seen as a gauge.
sounds like a series of excuses than actually scientific research.
Trophy deer are few and FAR between, the western section of the state provides a much better chance of harvesting an exceptional buck.
that maybe true but just because chances are better somewhere else, doesnt mean its impossible to kill a big buck where you live, its just harder, which was my origonal point you jumped all over w/ that potty language.
As far as my education is concerned, if you want to get into a rigid scientific discussion regarding genetics and molecular biology, I'm your huckleberry.
no thanks huckleberry, a bit on the nerdy side for my taste, no offense
