I also like this double-talk from the deceitful jackass that always puts these chronicles together: First off the question is, are public lands overharvested as compared to private. One would think the answer only obvious, but NOOOO as with everything pgc has an explanation! lmao. Even though as usual its contradictory and full of holes.

"Living on public land did not necessarily mean a doe was more likely to be harvested by a hunter."Then they say this in the next sentences! lol:

" In WMU 2G, the harvest rate on private land was 4 to 6 times greater than on public lands. In WMU 4B, harvest rates on public lands were slightly higher than on private lands. "

Correct me if im mistaken but 4 to 6 times higher is higher, and "slightly higher" on the other is STILL HIGHER no? lol.

Unreal. Who authors this crap?? I see noone steps forward and signatures their work on these "chronicles". Wonder if the reason is because they are so proud of the content? lmao.