Originally Posted by
teedub31
This is an exact quote from one of your earlier posts
"In my mind the only people worthy of the name "hunter" are the ones who can handle to job after the deer is on the ground"
From that statement anyone with any skills in logic can plainly see that you don't see anyone that does not butcher their own harvest as a hunter. Your incomplete hunter statement is just an attempt to cover your put down of the majority of the people on this board.
As far as farmers go, not sure what farmers you know, but the ones in east central Indiana don't know how to bring crap to the table as you say. Hardly any of them have any idea what it takes to make soybeans and field corn into any type of product that is able to be consumed by the public. They just plant, harvest and deliver it to a grain mill so that it can be processed by big food into the poison knows as high fructose corn syrup. Guess these guys are not farmers are they??
Someone else injected the word "non hunter" into this thread so I just repeated their terminology. To me a "non hunter" is someone who doesn't hunt at all, so I can't call someone who doesn't butcher their own deer a "non hunter". But I can and WILL call them an incomplete hunter. I am not covering anything up here, if the shoe fits then wear it. If it offends some of you here then maybe you shouldn't post on such a forum where varied opinions will be given. I am the last one who thinks that we should all love each other, sing "Kumbaya" together and never take each other to task just because we are supposed to be a fraternity. You can think of hunters who don't butcher their own deer as the epitome of hunters and manhood for all I care. I and others might however have different opinions of it. You see it your way and others will see it their own way.