HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - The Paranoid PGC
View Single Post
Old 10-23-2009 | 04:05 PM
  #48  
bluebird2
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BTBowhunter
I stand correctd. The 2001 harvest WAS 78% not 82%.

Doesnt make me a liar, it simply means I made a mistake and I am happy to man up to it.

(Of course I could take a Bluebird approach and claim that the harvest was 2002 since there would be some deer killed after Jan 1 but I choose not to twist the numbers the way you often do)

Again, I simply used the wrong year. 2000-2001 is actually the 2000 harvest. My bad!

Too bad for you it doesnt change anything.................

My original point was twofold. First that we were harvesting ABOUT 80% of our yearlings now we're harvesting about half. The point stands even though I mistakenly took the wrong year. I meant to take the last harvest before AR which is the 2001 harvest.

You conveniently dodged the second point. That the harvest of 2.5 bucks now is roughly half of the harvest and the number of the 2.5+ harvest is way up. You have repeatedly said the raw numbers of harvest of 2.5+ was down post AR and since you said it many times and have chosen NOT to recant (as I did my slip) You sir are the proven, pathalogical liar.

You also have said over and over that breeding rates are down when they have indeed not changed over time. Another Bluebird lie. (well stuck to though!)

Sorrry, once again that the new information upsets you so.
Once again you are lying. the only time I said the 2.5 + buck was lower than in 2002 was when the 2007 .2.5+ buck harvest was 48,000 compared to 52,900 in 2002,before any bucks were saved by ARs.

You also have said over and over that breeding rates are down when they have indeed not changed over time. Another Bluebird lie. (well stuck to though!)
I have repeatedly said breeding rates decreased from 93% in 2000 to 88% in 2007 and the PGC stats prove that I was right and that once again you are lying to cover your butt.

However , you proved you are dumber than a stump when you posted that the herd in 2A only decreased by 1% when the data you posted shows that the herd decreased by at least 3% in at least 4 of the last 5 years and the year that there was an increase it was only 1%.

so you have a choice, are you a liar or are you just exceedingly ignorant?
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply