Originally Posted by
bluebird2
Here is what you posted in the post to which I replied.
That is the buck harvest data from 2000 ,not 2001 as you claimed. the 2001 buck harvest was 44,700 2.5+ buck which was 22% of the buck harvest. The first year of ARs was 2002 and we harvested 52,900 buck and they were 32% of the harvest.
That makes you a documented liar.
I stand correctd. The 2001 harvest WAS 78% not 82%.
Doesnt make me a liar, it simply means I made a mistake and I am happy to man up to it.
(Of course I could take a Bluebird approach and claim that the harvest was 2002 since there would be some deer killed after Jan 1 but I choose not to twist the numbers the way you often do)
Again, I simply used the wrong year. 2000-2001 is actually the 2000 harvest. My bad!
Too bad for you it doesnt change anything.................
My original point was twofold. First that we were harvesting ABOUT 80% of our yearlings now we're harvesting about half. The point stands even though I mistakenly took the wrong year. I meant to take the last harvest before AR which is the 2001 harvest.
You conveniently dodged the second point. That the harvest of 2.5 bucks now is roughly half of the harvest and the number of the 2.5+ harvest is way up. You have repeatedly said the raw numbers of harvest of 2.5+ was down post AR and since you said it many times and have chosen NOT to recant (as I did my slip) You sir are the proven, pathalogical liar.
You also have said over and over that breeding rates are down when they have indeed not changed over time. Another Bluebird lie. (well stuck to though!)
Sorrry, once again that the new information upsets you so.