HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - The Paranoid PGC
View Single Post
Old 10-22-2009 | 11:49 AM
  #31  
BTBowhunter's Avatar
BTBowhunter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
Default

Originally Posted by bluebird2
Wrong again. Since ARs were implemented and the herd was reduced , there has been no increase in the breeding rate or the number of embryos/doe compared to 2002.
So you agree that breeding rates have not deteriorated as you once claimed


No one had to register to access the AWRs prior to yesterday. But ,apparently enough people called and complained that the PGC dropped the requirement.
While it's true that no one had to register before now, It's also a fact that registered use3r couldnt view it either. the logical and reasonable explanation is that there was another problem and you have nothing but your personal paranoia to support your theory that it was intentional

[quote]

There is a big difference between the mean embryos /doe and the number of fawns recruited. [quote]

Typical bluebird distortion. Fawns not born are fawns not recruited. While other factors besides birth rates also affect recruitment, birth rates are a major component


Mild or severe winters would have little if any effect on the breeding rates of adult doe.
Not what was said. Winter severity affects fawn recruitment not breeding rates

How much did the breeding rate have to increase in 2008 to raise the three year average by 5%?
I know exactly where you're headed with this. Not gonna take the bait. Why don't you tell us your answer and then I'll expose the little distortion game your planning on this one. (hint: it's not 5 but it's not 15 either LOL)


I think it's time to go climb a tree..........
BTBowhunter is offline  
Reply