Could it be that RSB's explanations for the anomaly in the breeding rates prior to this report are beginning to look pretty accurate?
No, RSB explanation was pure unadulterated horse puckey and I proved it using the PGC data. Nothing in the sampling protocol or distribution has changed from 2007 to 2008 to account for the 5% increase in breeding rates. Furthermore, since the PGC is still using 3 year averages , the change in breeding rates from 2007 to 2008 has to be much greater than 5% to raise the 3 year average by 5%.