Thats not the same as a farmer having his crops mauled or a timber company having to spend ridiculous amounts of money on fences. Once again, you take part of the picture and try to apply it to the whole state
The farmers and the timber companies have the tools they need to control the herd on their property. But, you are the one suggesting hunters that aren't happy should buy land and manage it at higher densities even if it has a negative effect on adjoining properties.
No, you are simply not willing to move to another hunting area, you have told us time and again that deer scouting is a waste of time, You've compared planting food plots to buying a deer....you simply want to stay put, make no effort, and stubbornly blame the PGC because your hunting isnt what you think it ought to be
So your solution is that are group of six hunters should move from an area with excellent habitat to a new area with poorer habitat and infringe on the hunting area of other hunters. That makes no sense and shows you don't understand the problem in the least. But, you support a plan that you admit you don't understand and bash your fellow hunters who don't have it as good as you.