"So I was wrong about nothing, I was correct in stating that a few a few vocal members of small % of malcontents will not ever have a say in how a democratic form of government sets directives to control how our society rules it populace."

Unless that small % of malcontents are the ones running the show. Then they do exactly as they please no matter how it effects the majority. No checks + no balances = bad business.

"And I am righter than rain about how like minded neighbors will have far more success in obtaining hunt able populations of deer within parameters that all can live with."

On a very limited and small scale, youd be right jim. Thats simply a pipedream when speaking of statewide or majority of the state. You simply arent gonna get "the weird guy" down the road who doesnt even talk to people + the guy who shoots every deer that walks + the guy that trophy only hunts + the farmer wanting less deer + the average joe + the guy with a poster on every tree, + the guy who owns 100 acres and allows anyone and everyone to hunt + old widow Smith who wont even answer the front door etc. etc. to sit down and manage the the deer herd statewide themselves nor should they be expected to. And as for hunters, the majority of the 900,000 arent landowners. And in most cases dont hunt "managed" land either. Only management most lands receive is that which is provided by pgc on gamelands and all private hunted land that isnt managed and as the case with stateforests, dcnr.