" neither one can be accepted blindly without considering the possible sampling problems."

You dont like the reproductive data that show a failed program? Fine. But your excuse doesnt support you or the failed program any more than if the results were 100% accurate and absolutely no possiblitity of sampling issues. It would then tell us the program is based, after several years, on absolutely nothing as far as herd health goes! Oh thats right, isnt that why pgc is being sued?

So on one hand you have failed repro data. If you choose the other, then it still doesnt support the program because the only available data, at best, shows nothing because its flawed, and at worst shows decreases across the board! And you see no problem with this? lmao.

"NOW who's painted into a corner?"

As usual you. Now go into the ranting your famous for when you find you have no logical reply, and start telling mistruths, and personal attack as the gentlemen above quite accurately pointed out.