Originally Posted by
bluebird2
And I will say this once again. Only a buffoon like you would claim to know that no one drew the same conclusion that I drew from Alt's statement. Words have meaning and when they are printed in the Digest year after year it is not a grammatical error. It is a claim that is supported by the PGC.
Therein lies your problem. You dwell on the miniscule meaningless minutia of some technical point that makes zero practical sense. You had to consult an english teacher for cryin out loud! You know thats not what was meant or said. Once again its the old Bluebird twist at its finest.