HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Who Has the Answer?
View Single Post
Old 09-23-2009 | 01:36 PM
  #78  
bluebird2
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default

Wrong again!! The PGC admitted that the harvest rates in the doe mortality study may not represent the true harvest rates. Furthermore, the buck harvest rate correlates directly to the estimated deer density in that WMU. The simple fact is that once the herd is reduced to 8 DPSM it can only support a harvest of less than 4 DPSM when the area is 90% forested.

Maybe 2A is now seeing a regeneration crash like 2G saw several years back.
Today 09:23 PM
That is pure nonsense . A regeneration crash may occur when populations are at the MSY carrying capacity of the habitat. They do not occur when the herd is being reduced.

So, since you claim to know what the "problem" is, obviously you have a solution. What is it?
__________________
Manage the herd based on the true carrying capacity of the habitat and let landowners that have a problem with deer damage manage their herd with DMAP tags, red tags and killing deer for crop damage.

Last edited by bluebird2; 09-23-2009 at 01:40 PM.
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply