Originally Posted by
bluebird2
The answer is simple , the sampling methodology is obviously flawed. There is no logical reason why the regeneration rate in 2G should decrease with a decreasing herd, just as there is no logical reason to explain a 25% decrease in regeneration in 2A or why 5C has the worst regeneration in the state when the deer have unlimited food supplies, a very long growing season and very mild winters with limited snow cover.
So, since you claim to know what the "problem" is, obviously you have a solution. What is it?