HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Who Has the Answer?
View Single Post
Old 09-23-2009 | 01:05 PM
  #72  
Cornelius08
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Default

"Sounds Cornie is a stranger to the concepts of time lag and correlation lag"

Yeah. I suppose you are gonna insult every member of this board reading this's intelligence by saying the effect has been "lagging" for decades? lmao. Because thats how long its been since this wmu had lower deer numbers than we do now! lmao.....and the habitat NEVER rated as poor by pgc here. reduction was supposedly done years ago. and all of a sudden "the lag effect lmao" it just showed up the year before last. No particular reason, just because lanse says so. LMAO! Regeneration being cut by ridiculous amount in two years. Two years with modern day low deer densities in the unit. lmao. Hell even the complete econuts biologists at audubon on their infamous "deer study" showed 2A to be healthier than most of the rest of the state for cryin out loud! lmao!

C'mon lanse. Lets revisit reality and give me a reasonable argument that makes SOME sense? I dont believe that position exists. But I sure enjoy seeing you try.

Last edited by Cornelius08; 09-23-2009 at 01:27 PM.
Cornelius08 is offline  
Reply