Now guys like you, the bird and the USP types continue to bash and demonize our hosts because they expect a decent return on their investment. [/QUOTE

That is another flat out lie. No one is demonizing or bashing the timber industry or other property owners. What we are questioning is if the PGC is lying to us when they claim they base the doe tag allocations on herd health and forest health. As yet no one can explain why the PGC wants to keep the herd stable in 11 WMUs when forest health varies significantly and there is no apparent correlation between deer densities and forest health.

Here is a quote from the PGC website regarding forest health and regeneration. How does the rankings compare to the data I posted?