[quote=bluebird2;3450190]
Now guys like you, the bird and the USP types continue to bash and demonize our hosts because they expect a decent return on their investment. [/QUOTE
That is another flat out lie. No one is demonizing or bashing the timber industry or other property owners. What we are questioning is if the PGC is lying to us when they claim they base the doe tag allocations on herd health and forest health. As yet no one can explain why the PGC wants to keep the herd stable in 11 WMUs when forest health varies significantly and there is no apparent correlation between deer densities and forest health.
LOL C'mon. Did you keep a staright face when you typed
That is another flat out lie. No one is demonizing or bashing the timber industry or other property owners.
Almost every page of this forum contains some reference to the timber industry and DCNR calling the shots or blackmailing the PGC
OK, that little joke of yours aside, you're long on criticism of the PGC deer goals. I was always taught not to criticize without a constructive alternative to offer. You've been asked to produce that many times here. How would you determine the goals and specifically what would they be? You claim to have all the facts the PGC uses so what's your plan?
Got an answer for us yet???