"Now i understand the magnitude of the conspiracy. The PGC is the largest employer in the world. Its vast multitude of employees include: hunters who disagree with Cornie, farmers who complain about crop damage, other rural/suburban residents who complain about damage to gardens, lawns, fruit trees, etc., and anybody who complains about deer at nuisance levels after multiple car/deer accidents"

Hmmm another extremist irrational illogical emotion based bunch of nothingness to be ignored from lanse. lmao. Nothing new here. Just trying to cause argument because he clearly has nothing better to do with his time, and no rebuttal to the facts of the matter. And the facts of the matter say it ridiculous to say excessive and extreme reduction is warranted because lance thinks it necessary even in the most rural wmus because of auto collisions. Though he,fails to say exactly how many deaths and collission damage IS acceptable.. Guess we should take the herd to zero then? DUH. Btw, I saw noone infer that all three hunters who support the deer plan nor anyone else was on the payroll especially those with complaints. They are used as excuses. Then again, having a couple of insurance agents on here, a couple of pgc employees, a usfs employee and god only knows who else doesnt quite do the hunter view justice, as shown by your ridiculous poll results that still didnt give you the result you were after. lmao.

I think your avatar, sig line and postings of "omega men" etc. say enough about your "views" lol. Little obtuse to say the least, and certainly shows maturity level. lmao.

Dont get p'oed at me. Pgc took into account "human conflict" issues that you are whining about all the way from Ohio, has stated on the annual reports the conflicts in many wmus as low and moderate and that was BEFORE we fully reduced the herd!, since there has been even MORE reduction for no apparent reason and all cac results have confirmed that conclusion again by not voting for decrease. All wanting increase or stabilization except sras. Have a problem with that assessment, take it up with them. I disagree with the continued slaughter for NO REASON. Not because its for "human conflict" because according to pgc statement and data, thats not currently the case in most wmus. Guess thats why the goal is "stabilization" in most? Even though they lied and are STILL reducing the wmus for the bionuts... Thats why i have a problem with the fraudulent agency. The failed deer plan and the excessive slaughter is/was based on absolutely noting other than ecoextremists wanting single and barely double digit deer densities because thats where trillium and hobblebush grow best.