"Millions of people accept the current costs of deer/auto accidents as normal?"

When was the last time you saw someone look at their policy and say "DANGED DEER! KILL THEM ALL BECAUSE MY COST IS TOO HIGH TO INSURE THE PICK UP AND I COULDA SAVED $3 A MONTH!!" (LOL) You havent, cause its a nonissue with anyone other than you apparently. lol....The herd has been reduced significantly.... I have yet to see my insurance cost deduction.

Wow, not only does Cornie speak for the all the hunters in areas of PA where he has never been, but now he is the voice of millions of non-hunters in a state that in the recent past has ranked anywhere from #5 to #1 in deer/auto accidents."

First Im not the one that brought on the self appointed speaker for all sentiment. That would be the pro-pgc side ifn you'll go back and reread. They insinuated it was a significant issue for us that justified mass wanton herd slaughter., without asking a single solitary soul. But since you brought it up again, sure i am very representative of a Pa driver. Sorrry that doesnt fit your strange "anti-deer in Pa from Ohio" agenda. I drive, as do every one of my adult family and friends... Hunters and non.

We are also one of the most populated states with the most roads. Where should we rank? In case you missed it, we cut the herd in half, so its hardly as if Pgc has ignored any and all deer related issues! lmao.... Then again, maybe we should just kill the rest of them so Lanse dosent have any more misleading deer related stats to post? Id also imagine we are near the top in accidents involving car on car collission, car on tree collission etc. etc. Maybe we should also remove all trees and all other drivers so Lanse doesnt hit anything on his bi-yearly trips through Pa from Ohio....(where the densities are higher in many areas! lmao.)