Then while you are at it, might also wanna explain why the regeneration in 2A dropped from 61% (coming off of a herd double ow density) down to 38% regen even though the herd was significantly reduced and continues to be! lmao.

How else can they justify future reduction in the best area of the state habitatwise if the habitat were rated as it truly is....superb, and the herd health is and has been fine all along, and only DECREASED since the failed plan. Also in a wmu where human conflict was rated as LOW in same wmu even previously?

Why was 2G rated as poor regen, yet the herd health was "at target" and had one of the HIGHEST embryo counts in the state!!

These questions do not have answers.

Could it all be a SHAM? Gee I think that makes sense.