"You make plenty of wild accusations and produce lots of conspiracy theories and claims but never produce any real proof."
Untrue. Im not like you who will say absolutely ANYTHING and everything no matter how far out there it is, to support your position. I make sure I know what im talking about BEFORE saying anything. Therefore I dont end up looking foolish as can often be the case with those who post BEFORE they think.
"You've claimed that there is some ominous group of pgc supporters, employees etc have multiple screen names yet you have several."
I dont have several. I have one. I once had another that was nearly identical to this one (boy big attempt to decieve eh? LMAO) and i stated in posts exactly why that was at the time. You however chose to vote with other ids. What makes you think YOU should have more votes on opinion polls than everyone else?
"We're supposed to believe..."
Frankly I dont care what "we" believe. Your opinion to me is absolutely meaningless in regards to pretty much anything. I wouldve pointed out your mistake as what "YOU" believe, but I dont buy it. You know the facts of the matter just as well as i. It just doesnt benefit you to make that known.
" You make accusations of votes under other names months after the alleged act but the only proof is your claimthat you "saw"it. "
It was factual. It also wasnt "months" later. I also provided the time and date of your vote, which was time stamped on the poll as the last vote....a vote that came AFTER the poll hadnt had a vote in days and wasnt exactly "active" and the only vote came in during the very short period of time that your id was in use. Unluckily for you, you were also seen entering and leaving the thread, and upon leaving ABRACADABRA, a vote magically appeared! You apparently didnt think to make your actions/being online invisible to other users as you do for some time with your current id. Big mistake eh chief? How many other times have you done this is the question?
"The thread where polls were intentionally manipulated specifically to prove that they could be produced interest from many but very vocal objections from only one
Interesting........"
Yes very interesting. First, I dont care to have my honesty and integrity even spoken of by someone such as yourself. Its beyond reproach. To some of us, those things matter. And you didnt call out "all polls" previously, you spoke specifically of a few. Complete nonsense, stated only to take the heat off of yourself because of being caught multiple voting just prior to that.
Second, I take issue with you questioning what to most is VERY obvious. Most of these topics certainly dont even need a poll to prove one way or another unless one has been living under a rock. You question the result because it doesnt support you. But questioning the result is kinda like questioning a poll because the results showed people wouldnt exactly enjoy sharp bamboo shoots driven under their toe nails. In case you hadnt guessed, the answer is no.
Also, i find it kind of interesting that you would be ok with voting using several id's, were the only one who apparently knew some bizarre method of cheating on polls other than "multipe ids" as well....yet didnt use it for your benefit?? Why is that when you werent above using multiple ids? I'll tell you why. Judging by your explanation of your "cheating technique" that had skewed every poll on here that didnt give the result you wanted lmfao... You would have had to change the question! lmao...(and hope none of the other members here noticed) and also hope noone noticed that the number of votes had also changed . Gee noone would notice any of that! Vote suddenly goes from 20 to 0 for one choice and arrangement of the poll itself changes 360d degrees, and noones gonna cry foul? Nice try chief.
Thats why you chose to say "all polls are tainted" even thought most had shown the only common sense "expected" results. Instead of losing credibility and attempting to alter polls, something you were assured of getting caught doing with basically ZERO chance of pulling off.
Then funny part is, claim statement polls were "legit" even though multiple ids are just as possible as they were previously!
:confu sed2: