What erroneous conclusions did I come up with before? Anyway, I will check outmy local library for the book, but the fact still remains, if they changed the letoff rule, according to their own definition of a hunting bow, a bow could have 99% let off(i' m not advocating this) and still be considered a hunting bow. Furthermore, in their own definition of letoff % they clearly state that minor variations in the 65% letoff rule are allowed due to " variations in draw length and/or draw weight can affect the percent of let-off on compound bows. For these reasons minor variations in let-off are acceptable."


What is the acceptable " minor" variation? 66%, 67.6%....who knows?