Totally INCORRECT. 4/5 of their potential members eliminated themselves. The rule was around LONG before this high letoff crap and they bought those bows anyway.
Whatever, samantics (sp?), glass half full or half empty? Both are correct just a mater of prospective. The fact is 4/5ths of the archery hunters are not a potential part of P&Y.
But, the point is, to say a person with a 80% bow only has an advantage over someone with a 65% bow using a scent-lok suit, sexual attractant, release, carbor, mechanical, bait-pile, ect is just silly.
If P&Y doesn' t want the largest animal taken with archery equipment to be in their record books, it is their chose. But their records are an inacuate reprecentation of the archery killed animals. AND THAT IS A FACT.