If regeneration is improving in 2G and 2F ,why isn't that improvement reflected in the PGC's forest health data?
Improvement would be seen in the field long before the data was actually gathered, analyzed and compiled so that it could be seen on a computer screen.
The improvement has been substantial everywhere I've been lately in 2F from my few acres to the vast ANF and I suspect this is the case where DougE and others have spent time.
When was the last time you walked the woods in 2F or 2G?