That simply is not true. the DCNR totally discounted the pellet count results in their Browse Study. Furthermore, they cannot assess the browsing impact on a particular cut until after the cut is made. As you so often stated,deer densities vary across any WMU and deer will concentrate in areas with suitable browse.

If regeneration is improving in 2G and 2F ,why isn't that improvement reflected in the PGC's forest health data?