SO let me get this straight....

My experience level being constantly called into question is OK. But my listing my accomplishments (mitigating the initial assertion), isn't?

It's to the point where my assertions aren't even evaluated on their merits. It's "look who posted it.....and we'll discount it, based on years afield".

I really don't care if a hunter has been hunting deer ONE year....IF his tactics are of sound judgement and proven. I can learn from that guy (and will, gladly).

I never told you not to cross the corn, Jeff. I said I wouldn't (in the AM....PM, different story).....and gave reasoning as to why. End of story (and I wasn't the only one to advise against it.....including the articles you posted to bolster your assertions).

You can continue to constantly call my experience level into question. But my results speak for themselves. So what (exactly) is my apparent lack of experience costing me, as far as results? I'm curious.