Originally Posted by
Cornelius08
The way I see it Rem, PGC isnt saying we have alot of deer. They are saying we have few. I dont see much to disagree with that when they say units 2G, 5A, and 5D had 10 or less dpsm on the 2006 annual report, nor do I doubt it when they give the data that shows the very best wmus in the state have on average less than 25 owdpsm. Those are some of the lowest deer densities you'll find as "top" deer density goals in the nation. And those lower wmus with lower densities pretty much speak for themselves. lol
My problem isnt with pgcs density guestimate. The problem is with what deer densities they deem as necessary... and their goals, which consist currently of extreme unnatural levels of biodiversity. What they call "stabilization" is also a farce. When in actuallity it is "slower but continued reduction".
Cornelius08:
I agree totally,,,,what boggles the mind here is guys like BTB and DougE that are right "up the donkeys A$$ head 1st and cant see the horse for the farm"! These guys that can state #'s in every sentence trying to get their points across ,,that its a sunny day,, when i can walk out the door and see it's rainin like a mother F'r. I expect this kind of BS from a govt entity like the PGC but this kind of rhetoric coming from guys like us in the field wipes me out! And whats more!.,,,,these guys will post pics on this site showing what they feel is a good buck,,"due to the current laws in Pa"that they have killed in the past couple years and i have yet to be impressed,,,not that i have killed bigger mind you,,,,but what they are posting is not what a true wildlife mgmt minded hunter would be bragging about. ??????????????????????