The way I see it Rem, PGC isnt saying we have alot of deer. They are saying we have few. I dont see much to disagree with that when they say units 2G, 5A, and 5D had 10 or less dpsm on the 2006 annual report, nor do I doubt it when they give the data that shows the very best wmus in the state have on average less than 25 owdpsm. Those are some of the lowest deer densities you'll find as "top" deer density goals in the nation. And those lower wmus with lower densities pretty much speak for themselves. lol

My problem isnt with pgcs density guestimate. The problem is with what deer densities they deem as necessary... and their goals, which consist currently of extreme unnatural levels of biodiversity. What they call "stabilization" is also a farce. When in actuallity it is "slower but continued reduction".