Originally Posted by Cornelius08

Buckhunter, I agree about the politicians. You have those who actu'ally are "hunter oriented" pandering to the outdoorsmen of the state for votes. Then on the other hand you have the total econut cut-throats to hunters who also do the same... And ALL as you stated correctly i belive...looking to recieve and return favor of votes on other issues.

Those who support the deer slaughter for the econuts say they are simply supporting more hunter opportunity. Then when pushing for alternate funding to further cut off the hunter voice, they are "helping" us by granting funding so pgc can provide more services for US! lol.

Seems pgc has forgotten that they are supposed to be an "independant" agency? Guess they are willing to part with that independence in favor of cash. Mighty funny Kdavis and other pgc flunkies who preach over and over and over to anyone who will listen on hpa website not to go to legislators and to KEEP LEGISLATORS OUT AT ALL COSTS.... are the ones on their knees begging legislators to give them money. Money that an "independent" agency should have no part of. Money straight from the state coffers.

Whats funny due to us having so many hunters they already have as much or more funding currently than any other state in the nation including those with alternate funding, AND we have the gas on the gamelands....another funding source they didnt have previously... yet a license fee increase is on the horizon and alternate funding. Would be really a mess to see them get BOTH. lol. Maybe they could then afford sharpshooters to come in and shoot the deer with gold plated bullets?

All that money, and we will STILL be the state with deer wars, econuts running the show and the lowest hunter satisfaction in the entire nation.