My bad. A quick reference to the AWR 2008 showed 2G (1.68)third behind 5D (1.71), and 1B (1.69). Regardless, if soil was the determing factor, then why would WMU's with better regeneration, not to mention arguably better soils and more agriculture, lag substantially behind 2G which for years has been labeled as the epicenter of the unhealthy forests. So much for the habitat controlling the herd theory, when they have the third highest productivity in the state!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Screamin Steel; 07-23-2009 at 07:07 AM.