Originally Posted by
bluebird2
Here is an exact quote of what the experts are saying.
Please note that it states that at 30+ DPSM deer maintain body condition and a high reproductive rate. That directly contradicts your claim that the habitat in 2G is controlling at 8 DPSM.
Furthermore, the data that you provided shows that the habitat in Elk Co. support 30 DPFSM in 1987 and 26 DPFSM in 2000. So the der where you live and the data you provided shows you are not telling the truth.
Don’t you think there is a HUGE different between 30 and 100 deer per square mile?
Yesterday you were claiming the habitat depleted areas of the north central could and should have 100 deer per square mile, now you produce a SNIPPET from somewhere that clearly says that at even 30 deer per square mile the deer have reached the NUTRIITIONAL carrying capacity.
Either you don’t understand/comprehend what you are reading and posting, since they contradict what your other posts, have gone senile or otherwise just plain have no idea what you are talking about. Or, select box number two for all of the above.
Oh, and if you believe there are only 8 deer per square mile in unit 2G you are just proving that you don't have a clue what is really occurring in unit 2G.
R.S. Bodenhorn