Originally Posted by
bluebird2
I find it rather amusing that you and RSB want the herd to be managed based on the best science available, but when the science disagrees with your opinions you reject what the experts are saying. For example, you claim the habitat is reducing the herd in 2G, but the experts say that even in an over browsed contiguous forest non-hunting morality does not equal recruitment until the DD reaches 75 DPSM. Therefore, the max. CC of the habitat in TL should exceed 100 DPSM , so there is no reason to believe the habitat is controlling the herd anywhere in the state.
Where did I say non hunting mortality was exceeding recruitment?