Originally Posted by
bawanajim
I think your missing a great opportunity for some incredible hunting.
I see no reason not to let the age of the herd to increase and with this age a better generic make up of the herd will surface.
.
Originally Posted by
bluebird2
Did you mean the "genetic" make up of the herd? If so the exact opposite is more likely to occur since ARs are the exact opposite of natural selection.
Now Blue bird, I'm going to try to make this as simple as possible;
You state that the opposite of " a BETTER genetic make-up will occur ". That can only mean, at least to us in NY State, that you are saying a WORSE genetic make-up will occur. You know, opposite of BETTER. If AR's have that effect, as you say, then non- AR's HAVE to have at least that effect.
Unless, of course, in a non-ar region, hunters are allowing all breeding age buck to pass. Let's see, I'm hunting in a non-AR zone, and I have the choice of shooting that small 8pt, or that crotch horn next to him. Yup, your right, I'm Naturally selecting the crotch horn. LMAOAYDS.
You got any more of that $hit?, or is it " one dog, one bone "