ORIGINAL: ManySpurs
Yes more deer are unrecovered in archery because nearly all deerneed to be blood trailed unlike when using a high powered rifle
Do you have any kind of facts to support that statement? Some kind of a survey or something? I highly doubt that 250,000+- bowhunters can leave more unrecovered deer laying in the woods than 900,000+- firearms hunters. Winter and springshed hunting forays tell me that.[:-]
Let me rephrase that.... I should have said there is a more likely chance that if all variables being equal other than weapon chosen it is more difficult to recover game taken with a bow than a rifle. I believe having more hunters will undoubtedly increase the number of deer recovered as well as increasing the number of thoseunrecovered but not by the same overall percentage when comparing rifles to archery or inline to flintlock. I agree with what you are saying. I am simply stating it takes a bit moretime and dedication when it comes to successfully recovering deer with a bow compared to deer with a gun. Hence my suggestion of mandating a bow hunter ed course for those who can't produce a pre-xbow hunting license, or for all archery hunters for that matter.