Here are the antler less allocation and harvest histories for the counties that make up 2G, with both expressed in units per square mile, to prove what I said above.
Data set…………………88-92.……….93-97.…………98-02.…………03-07
Antlerless license……….16.21.……….13.08.………†¦12.30.………….8.65
Deer harvests…..………..9.55.…………8.00.…⠀¦â€¦â€¦.8.53.…………..4.00
You really are one funny duck who has no idea waht the dat you post shows. Whether you realize it or not , you have just shown that the high antlerless allocations from 1988 to 1997 reduced the herd So it is obvious that you agree that harvests that exceeded recruitment reduced the harvest from 9.55 to 4.00.
Thanks for proving once again you simply are clueless.