ORIGINAL: bawanajim
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
So despite your propaganda , the fact is 2G has not been subject to high DDs from the 70s as you claimed. The fact is that 2G has been at or below its goal for ten years , but forest health is still rated poor by the PGC despite your claims to the contrary.
So your answer to this poor habitat is to add more deer to the area? Brilliant, just simple brilliant.
Well you certainly aren't very brilliant since the deer in 2G are telling us the habitat is just fine. But I guess you would rather listen to the propaganda spread by Doug and RSB rather than listening to the deer and the PGC xperts..
Why do you think 2G has the third highest productivity rate in the state if the habitat is so poor?