ORIGINAL: bluebird2
ORIGINAL: DougE
You are losing it.How could the deer possibly have been healthier then?
In 2000 breeding rates were higher ,productivity was high and recruitment was much higher in 2000 than in 2007. Therefore, based on the PGC criteria for determining herd health, the herd was healthier when we had 1.6M PSD.
So how on earth could the herd get more unhealthy as there's more food?Nevermind,I'll answer it for you.It can't
Your spinning is going around in circles.On numerous occassions I've herd you say that you figured the breeding rates were declining because you felt that the felt the older age does where getting shot.Now,when it's convenient to use the PGC stats to your advatage,you say the herd is unhealthy.
It's impossible and you know it.The numbers show what they show because the sample size is statistically insignificant.