How do you know the DD was very low in that area? Did you do a pellet count or was the areas part of a FLIR survey? If not you are just guessing and really have no idea why that area regenerated . The fact is many areas have better regeneration with much higher DDs than other areas with lower deer DDs that also have lower regeneration. WMU 2F and 2G are a prime example. WMU 2F produced a harvest of 6,67 DPSM with 39% regeneration while 2G only produced a harvest of 3.84 DPSM, but regeneration decreased from 42% to 38%.Also 3A produced a harvest of 7.69 DPSM with a regeneration rate of 61 %. Therefore, there obviously is a direct correlation between DD and regeneration because there are numerous other variables that determine the rate of regeneration.