ORIGINAL: Screamin Steel
ORIGINAL: R.S.B.
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Now you are just being silly ,because you can not provide one bit of evidence that shows SFLs have lower DDs than SGLs.
We both know that the biodiversity CC of northern hardwoods is only 8 DPSM and that 40 DPSM is the MSY CC. But in 2G where the herd is being managed at around 8-9 DPSM the forest health is still rated poor the the amount of regeneration is decreasing rather than increasing.
Actually you don’t know that at all and are doing
nothing more then taking some EXTREMELY general information about a very few habitat and deer densities studies and trying to apply that on a large scale.
Your generalizations in the application of the limited subject research are simply not an accurate representation of reality within any of the various units of management.
In other words you simply have no idea what you are talking about most of the time. You are proving that wildlife and habitat management are simply beyond your capacity of knowledge and understanding.
R.S. Bodenhorn
LMAO, RSB!!!!! You just stole a page from the PGC's SOP manual on the HR fiasco and actually tried to use it on someone else! Take very general statements/ research from a few localized habitats and write an extermination order for deer statewide based on it. That was a beautiful synopsis of the PGC basis for HR and the current deer plan, and I actually couldn't have said it better myself. Much appreciated.
Still LMAO!
OK,just a few localized habitats were negatively overbrowsed by deer.That there is funny.then again,it;s not surprising coming from a guy that expects a kid to be able to kill a buck every year on opening day by noon,most likely from the same stand as well.