ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Now don't get all flustered just because the experts at the PGC disagree with you. Just take a look at the recent issue of deer chronicles and see for yourself that regeneration in 2G decreased instead of increasing. Since the PGC bases the allocation of doe tags on herd and forest health, it is very unlikely they will allow the herd to increase even if there is some improvement in the understory.
Right there is yet another perfect example of how little you actually know and how out of touch you are with the realities of habitat and deer populations.
It is you the wildlife and habitat management experts are and have been disagreeing with. You just don’t get it because you think you know a lot more about how it all works then you do. You don’t seem to have any real knowledge of how nature really works or how variable nature is. You base everything on studies that have provided some general research information and then try to make everything in nature respond to your mathematical conclusions. Nature doesn’t respond to your mathematical calculations of conclusions and instead works within the reality of many changing variables.
It isn’t even a question of the Game Commission allowing or not allowing more deer. The number of deer is determined by the ability of the food supply to sustain more or fewer deer day after day all year long and that is very flexible based on a multitude of variables within reality. That is how nature works. You nor the Game Commission can change that fact no matter what you are anyone else thinks should be happening.
R.S. Bodenhorn