HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - The good, the bad & the ugly.
View Single Post
Old 06-27-2009 | 05:55 PM
  #48  
Cornelius08
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: The good, the bad & the ugly.

"lol corneball you sure don't like it when someone doesn't agree with you."

Nope. Not at all. Dont mind anyone disagreeing. Only reason I wasnt "polite" is because you intentionally came off as a total arsehole. So thats how you got treated. If you act like you have sense and act respectful, you get the same in return, if you dont, with me you reap what you sow. Dont make me one bit 'o difference. Ive dealt with complete jackasses before and Im sure I will again in the future.

"personally i just like getting you fired up."

Im no more "fired up" than you are. But I do find if extremely funny the way that I get the best of you in your attempts at "exchanges" and you make comments like you just did to somehow distract attention from that fact. LMAO.

"what you have to say means very little."

Means enough for you to reply and whine like a 6 year old girl about my posts evidently. lmao.

"WE hunt."

Ok, you big bad hunter you! lmfao...

"the current management plan needs changed but its not going to happen overnight like you want it to."

Its not going to willingly on pgcs part period. Course you dont follow the plan and clearly know extremely little about it, or the real goals behind it etc. Could probably sum up your entire knowledge of the program as the very basic 3 or 4 company line statements made by pgc over and over for the last several years. And I dont feel like teaching school to you and writing a book for you to catch up. So either read through the archives or study up for the next 3 years straight, then when you have a clue what the hell you are talking about, c'mon back. Maybe you can then provide rational opposition.

And nearly a decade now is hardly "over night" lmao! Since YOU have no say in the matter, I dont know why you would bother telling ME what any "terms" are gonna be! lol.


"if all of the sudden they tried changing the plan and allocated less tags how do you think the people who don't get one will feel?"

Oh my god, so broken hearted. Please, lets not have reasonable numbers of deer....Someone may not get their 2 to 5 tags this season! lmao

"it'll take years to fix unless we stop hunting for a year or 2 and nobody hunts them."

It wouldnt take "years" with appropriate allocations. Dont know if you think that would somehow matter to me personally, I couldnt care less, wouldnt hurt me one bit satisfactionwise if we stopped doe hunting for the next friggin 3 decades if that ridiculous extreme was what it took to right the ship. I havent hunted doe in years anyway. Do YOU practice what YOU preach? I'll bet not. lol

."for now hunting-wise you've gotta hunt whats there.and the deer are there "

Gee ya think??

"(bucks included,and bigger bucks then you seem to think)."

Naaa. Sorry. Youre either blind or an idiot. The pgc data shows a steady decline in 2.5+ year old bucks since hr has continued in the last 4 or 5 years. Thats if you believe the data and dont even believe it worse than it is. Course it doesnt take more than a gomer pyle intellect to understand when you hack the herd in half your not gonna have more deer, youre not gonna have more buck and that includes big buck. Are there some areas, particularly the worst areas, and the areas that were the worst previously slightly more big bucks? Possibly. Unfortunately many of the others have seen a steep decline thanks to excessive unnecessary hr.

"your talking politics not hunting here."

Because thats whats involved. And since you clearly are not up to snuff and educated on the dirty politics involved, its no wonder you speak the nonsense that you do.

"you have little to no actual real life experience facts."

Probably about 10X more than you. I just dont have much reason to share them with a total dipchit for no apparent reason. To use only my personal experience as ammo against the deer plan would not only show me to be extremely selfish, it would also be completely meaningless in the big picture.

"just what you've read or found on the internet.and yeah maybe what i think doesn't agree with you BUT i tell it like i see it not what i've read.so therefore my opinion is not wrong. "

PGc and most of their supporters want facts and data to "argue" they couldnt give a rats arse about what I see or dont see personally. That accounts for such a tiny piece of the puzzle its meaningless from a management standpoint. But if it makes you feel better, What i "see" is fewer deer for no good reason. Less buck. And less big buck. And EVERYONE in this area has similar observations and agrees with me 100%. There, you happy now? lmao.
Cornelius08 is offline  
Reply