HuntingNet.com Forums - View Single Post - Opinions please...(on cuddeback capture)
Old 06-23-2009 | 04:33 PM
  #8  
bowmanaj's Avatar
bowmanaj
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,088
Likes: 0
From: Ohio and Indiana
Default RE: Opinions please...(on cuddeback capture)

"I bought this camera because all you hear about is Cuddeback. I have 3 Moultrie D-40 4.0 cameras that I bought for $69.94 not $199.99 like the cuddeback. I set the Moultrie and the Cuddeback on the same tree looking in the same direction for 3 days, the Moultrie had 99 pictures the cuddeback had 13. when the cuddeback does take a picture the trigger speed is so slow the anamal that set it off is not in the picture. I am returning this camera and buying 3 more moultrie cameras for $10 more than the price of one Cuddeback."

This is one of the bad reviews on basspro's site, andthe reasonwhy I was scared about dropping 2 hundred bucks on one cam. Call me cheap (I kind of have to be right now) but price was the main reason I buy moultrie d-40's. HOWEVER, I love the moultries most of the time but HATE blurry pictures.
Did this person just get a bad cam?? I know this happens, what are your thoughts. I am still going to get a capture because the majority of reviews are good. I guess there arejust batches bad cams around??
bowmanaj is offline  
Reply