I have hunted about 4 wmus in pretty recent years, more previously. All poor by my standards currently. Not looking to skew anything. It is what it is.

Course if youd like, I could stretch it a bit and say 1 was fair 2 was poor and one was a waste of time if that'd make it more acceptable?? Seems it would all pretty much equal out to poor anyway.

And not looing to "play games", but then neither was i in the polls that Id run previously despite whining over the results. It would not be fair if my wmus were summed up as one poor vote and another had 4 which ranged from fair to excellent.

My vote would count as one poor. Their 4 votes averaged in, all better than poor would greatly over-ride my lone vote and skew the results. Not trying to nitpick, but thats a pretty blatant poll error to make, certain to effect any results.

You should either include as many as they wanna give (which could be abused) or you take only one. But not "pick and choose" when its acceptable to accept more and when it isnt.

Or you could just make it by wmu then it would be one vote per poster per wmu...

Just tryin' to help ya out there buddy. LOL