Personally , I don't think anyone can provide a valid answer to your question. Furthermore I don't think it is fair or reasonable to expect the habitat in PA to produce the same hunter success rate as in states with half as many hunters as PA. Also , using total harvest data from PA doesn't tell the whole story, because our harvests were inflated by the excessive doe harvests that reduced our herd. A more meaningful indicator would be the buck kill , but that would still be influenced by the relative number of hunters.