Dont have much time to be on today, but will post this quickly for you lans, just to show what a true joke Pa is compared to "normal" states.

Georgia in 2007 had only 291,911 total deer hunters. They harvested 143,092 bucks. That is more buck harvested than us with over 900,000 hunters. Link: ONE STATE OF MANY BETTER THAN PA

Similar things to this can be done over and over and over for other states of the country. RSB posts deceptive data that shows nothing. Here in Pa what good is higher harvest per square mile if your overall odds per hunter are lower??? What good is it if its unsustainable? What good is it if the buck harvest is declining steadily (along with herd size) because of that overharvest of does??