We've listened to the liars catering to audubon, and the first picture is what our herd is for it.

"Here is a partial list of the things the experts got wrong.
1. ARs did not double the number of 8 pts. "

GOOD POINT BB. I REMEMBER THE ASNINE CLAIM, AND IT WAS AN IMPOSSIBLE PROMISE USED TO CRAM THE EXCESSIVE REDUCTION DOWN OUR THROATS WHO CARES IF THEY SLAUGHTER THE DOE IF BIG BUCKS ARE BEHIND EVERY TREE?? UNFORTUNATELY IT WAS AN IMPOSSIBILITY FROM DAY ONE.

"2. We do not have more and larger buck than ever before. "

EXCESSIVE REDUCTION WOULDNT ALLOW FOR IT.

"3. The buck harvest did not return to normal as predicted."

YES, ANOTHER FAILED FAMOUS PREDICTION FROM THE Alt-poleon. LITTLE DEER DICTATOR.


"4. There never was a problem with the B/D ratio."

WELL IT WAS NICE OF THEM TO ADMIT IT AFTER THE DAMAGE WAS DONE WASNT IT? LMAO!

"5. ARs did not reduce the breeding window as predicted."

ALL ONE NEED DO IS CONSULT THE ANNUAL REPORTS THAT SHOW THAT DIDNT HAPPEN.

6. Breeding rates and productivity did not increase as predicted. Instead statewide breeding rates decreased by 5%.

AGAIN, AGREE COMPLETELY, CAN BE SEEN ON THE ANNUAL REPORT BY ANYONE THAT CAN READ.

7. There never was a problem with late born fawns as Alt claimed there was.

COULDNT HAVE BEEN ANY MORE THAN CURRENTLY.

"8. Reducing the herd to the biodiversity CC in 2G did not produce the increase in regeneration that was predicted and forest health is still rated as poor. "

AND UNLESS THEY KEEP THE HERD BETWEEN 0 and 10 DPSM FOR 50 YEARS OR MORE, THEY NEVER WILL. THAT IS UNLESS THEY PULL THEIR HEADS OUT OF BUTTS AND QUIT BLANING EVERY PROBLEM THE WORLD HAS ON THE DEER.

"9. WMUs that were once rated poor or fair for herd health are now rated to be at their targeted goal, even though productivity has not increased. "

WHATEVER IS CONVENIENT FOR THEM. WE'VE SEEN PLENTY ENOUGH NONSENSE THAT THEY CANT EVEN BEGIN THE EXPLAIN...BUT HEY, ITS CONVENIENT FOR THEM, AND EQUATES TO STAYING THE FAILED ECONUT COURSE. WHAT ELSE DO THEY CARE ABOUT? LMAO!

"10. Predicted increases in productivity did not come close to making up for the effects of HR ,so the sustanable harvest has been reduced by around 40%."

AND A HERD and HUNTER NUMBERS CONTINUING TO DECLINE.