ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
"I guess we've waited long enough for you to prove by your lack of a response that you don't understand the dynamics of antlerless deer management. It aint taught in 5th grade but any 5th grader can certainly understand it!
In 2000 when there were far too many deer throughout most of the state, it took less tags to generate one harvested doe becaue it took less effort or skill for hunters to harvest them simply because there were so many. Now that there are significantly fewer deer, it takes more doe tags to generate a havested doe than it used to. "
BTB, its funny how some, instead of becoming educated, post one post after another, each LESS educated than the last.[8D] You should pull your facts from somewhere other than other pgc supporters butts and think rationally instead of regurgitating bullsquat. While what you say is true in regards to tags per deer and hunter success rate declining.... AND needing more tags to accomplish the same harvest... The obvious thing youre grossly overlooking is the fact WE DO NOT WANT THE SAME HARVESTS!!! The goal is STABILIZATION supposedly now, and the herd is MUCH smaller. You do NOT want the same harvest that reduced a much larger herd, nor even close. It would cause much greater rate of reduction than it did previously!!! Youre 100% off the mark commentary also wouldnt explain why the HARVEST GOALS in some wmus as Ive pointed out time and again WERE HIGHER!! Not only the allocation, but the goals themselves. Even though the last four years were supposed to be stabilization in the wmu, the harvest goal for 2A was 18,000 for a few years straight, right after a harvest of 16,500 reduced the herd here by 7% according to pgc annual report. WTF?? Can you say no logical explanation, and btb is once again blindly supporting that which cannot be supported by fact.
The goals are less deer where reduction is the goal. And the goal is reduction where stabilization is the lie told just to appease hunters because there is no justification in many wmus for that continued hr that has been ongoing the last four years, as attested to by the annual reports in spite of claims of stabilization Its an enviromentalist extremist nutcase agenda, and they may as well call us little California or New Jersey Senior thanks to our nonhunter friendly current policies and permitting nuts to run the show.
Its all a big sham and its about to be rubber stamped.
LOL! How ironic for YOU of all people to tell someome to look at the facts.
Your posts are 99% loudmouth ranting with maybe an occasional tidbit of fact inserted. Anyidiot can see that the doe harvest has pretty much stabilized. It always comes back to the same old BS. Do we listen to the professionalss or to some fool whos obviously spittin mad because his favorite deer spot just aint what it used to be? Do we listen to the jackass screaming "econuts econuts" or do we listen to the professionals who have the support and approval of all the noteworthy deer professionals acrosss the country?
Scream on little man. rant rave and fume away! Tell us all about how good of a hunter you are LOL, tell us how strong you are LOL. Yell liar liar or make wild conspiracy claims at everyone with thenads to dispute you LOL.. Vote early and often in your silly little polls. Yell away with every post. All that does is estabish your identity as an internet blowhard. You might as well get it out of your system thoughbecause things arent ever going to change to suit you. Not in this lifetime anyway.
