"I guess we've waited long enough for you to prove by your lack of a response that you don't understand the dynamics of antlerless deer management. It aint taught in 5th grade but any 5th grader can certainly understand it!

In 2000 when there were far too many deer throughout most of the state, it took less tags to generate one harvested doe becaue it took less effort or skill for hunters to harvest them simply because there were so many. Now that there are significantly fewer deer, it takes more doe tags to generate a havested doe than it used to. "

BTB, its funny how some, instead of becoming educated, post one post after another, each LESS educated than the last.[8D] You should pull your facts from somewhere other than other pgc supporters butts and think rationally instead of regurgitating bullsquat. While what you say is true in regards to tags per deer and hunter success rate declining.... AND needing more tags to accomplish the same harvest... The obvious thing youre grossly overlooking is the fact WE DO NOT WANT THE SAME HARVESTS!!! The goal is STABILIZATION supposedly now, and the herd is MUCH smaller. You do NOT want the same harvest that reduced a much larger herd, nor even close. It would cause much greater rate of reduction than it did previously!!! Youre 100% off the mark commentary also wouldnt explain why the HARVEST GOALS in some wmus as Ive pointed out time and again WERE HIGHER!! Not only the allocation, but the goals themselves. Even though the last four years were supposed to be stabilization in the wmu, the harvest goal for 2A was 18,000 for a few years straight, right after a harvest of 16,500 reduced the herd here by 7% according to pgc annual report. WTF?? Can you say no logical explanation, and btb is once again blindly supporting that which cannot be supported by fact.

The goals are less deer where reduction is the goal. And the goal is reduction where stabilization is the lie told just to appease hunters because there is no justification in many wmus for that continued hr that has been ongoing the last four years, as attested to by the annual reports in spite of claims of stabilization Its an enviromentalist extremist nutcase agenda, and they may as well call us little California or New Jersey Senior thanks to our nonhunter friendly current policies and permitting nuts to run the show.

Its all a big sham and its about to be rubber stamped.