I have not read all the case dockets, so you might be correct in that smokeless powder was used to blow some of them rifles up. Some do claim they were not using smokeless powder. A few I read wereusing manufacturer approved powder,and actually some of the loads were what I would have considered safe. Then there is the question of who is telling the truth of course. I was not there watching them load, nor did I see the gun in question.

As for Wakeman being in the pockets of lawyers, I have no facts to support or rebutsuch a statement. I would be interested in hearing your facts though. Shoot it to me in a PM if you like. If you mean he is called on to testify in court cases, I have heard that is a fact.

As to will that site stop me from shooting my CVA Staghorn? Not a chance. Its a great rifle and shoots very well for me. All I am saying is there is another side to this question out there. Whether you want to believe what is posted and the people that post it, is a personal choice.