ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
alright see we can gain ground when we put some of the childish stuff behind.
Other than the name calling and mud slinging
No there shouldn't be connections but is anyone without them volunteered to do the job?
Spot on bowtruck.
I'm not saying that we should buy into the results when it's done. I bet that qualified contractor could be tied to either the PGC, or some other entity that would make the Cornboy cry foul.
The world of wildlife management is not that large. What is true is that the bird and cornboy have not come up with anything to discredit WMI except to say that they've worked with the PGC before. The other two bidders have also worked with or directly for the PGC.
BTB, it's not so much the fact that WMI has worked with PGC before....It's the work itself. They helped draft the current deer plan! In effect we are asking them to audit their own work! Next time you are up for a raise, give yourself your own performance evaluation. Trust me...you will love the outcome! As for the USP president sanctioning the audit, I could care a less. At this point, and with such limited options, their back is against the wall. They are merely pi$$ing into the wind hoping for a miracle. Again,I urge the sportsmen of PA to personally contact WMI via the links I posted earlier, flood them with calls and emails and make our wishes known in regards to the audit. Ask them the hard questions that the PGC refuses to answer and demand their attention. It's all we can do at this point.