Agreed. But I and many others believe its been taken to extremes.

And also, despite claims of reduction having been accomplished and the new goal supposedly "stabilization" , that goal is not a truthful claim. Where "reduction" is no longer the goal (supposedly pretty much everywhere but the sras for last 4 years) the annual reports show a much different story, with much continued reduction through the majority of wmus within those last 4 years. Ive also often pointed out particular wmus having more tags now even with goal of supposed stabilization than they did when they had a larger herd and reduction was the goal. Also, having higher stated harvest goals than the antlerless harvests used to REDUCE the LARGER herd. Thats bs. If thats not pointed out in an audit, then its a sham. This is rediculous, its blatant, its insulting to our intelligence and its a slap in the face to the hunters of this state for this to be going on. Will an audit point this out or solve our problems? I really sincerely doubt it. Especially given the powerful players involved and the circumstances and ties between the auditor and auditee.